Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 127 Download : 95

Main Article Content

Abstract

Currently, democracy has given its place to people all over the world, both in Türkiye and Indonesia. In various countries, especially in Türkiye and Indonesia, the government is always faced with various problems, especially related to democracy. One of the problems of democracy in Türkiye is related to the social structure. In Turkish society, where traditional social characteristics are dominant, individual life is not a pleasant lifestyle and social characteristics do not allow it. Although the ongoing modernization efforts throughout the history of the Republic of Türkiye have united the society with modern life to some extent, when viewed as a whole, it is seen that the society still develops attitudes and behaviors suitable for the characteristics of Turkish culture. In addition, Indonesian society also has its own characteristics, and the way in which Indonesia implements democracy also refers to the situation of a multi-ethnic country, so every policy made by the government takes great care not to cause political turmoil in the society. In this study, the researcher places more emphasis on the theories and concepts of democracy related to Türkiye and Indonesia. Several theories related to democracy are used to support this research in order to provide a clear picture of democracy in Türkiye and Indonesia.

Keywords

Türkiye and Indonesia Democracy Public Welfare Government System State Policy

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Author Biography

Mustafa Zafer Soydan, Sakarya University, Türkiye

Political Science and Public Administration

References

  1. Acemoglu D., & Robinson A.J. (2014). Uluslarin Dususu: Guc, Zenginlik ve Yoksullugun Kokenleri, Cev. F. Rasim Veziroglu, Dogan Kitap Y. Istanbul.
  2. Aksin, S. (2004). Ana Cizgileriyle Turkiye'nin Yakin Tarihi, 5.Bsm, Imaj Y. Ankara.
  3. Arslan, R. (2004). Turkiye'de Siyasi Model (Devlet, Demokrasi, Yonetim Modelleri ve Turkiye'ye Siyasi Model), 1. Baski, Ankara.
  4. Arslan, U., & Dogan, C. (2004). Demokrasi ve Ekonomik Buyume. Mustafa Kemal Universitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitusu Dergisi, 1(1), 1-13.
  5. Belge, M. (2009). “Turkiye’de Siyasi Dusuncenin Ana Cizgileri”, Modern Turkiye’de Siyasal Dusunce: Donemler ve Zihniyetler, 1.Bsm. Ed. T.Bora, M.Gultekingil, Iletisim Y. Istanbul.
  6. Bilgin, V. (2007). Turkiye’de Degisimin Dinamikleri, Lotus Y. Ankara.
  7. Can, O. (2012). Yol Ayriminda: Statukodan Once Son Cikis,Timas, Y. Istanbul
  8. Cem, I. (2011). Engeller ve Cozumler (Turkiye'de Sosyal Demokrasi). 1. Baski, Turkiye Bankasi Kultur Y. Istanbul.
  9. Diken, S. (2006). Turkiye'de Sivil Hayat ve Demokrasi. 1. Baski, Dipnot Y. Ankara
  10. Dodd, C.H. (1992). The Development of Turkish Democracy. British Journal of Middle Eastern Studies, 19 (1). Pp.16-30.
  11. Dogan, A. (2005). Demokrasi ve Ekonomik Gelisme. Erciyes Universitesi Iktisadi ve Idari Bilimler Dergisi, 25, 1-19.
  12. Dursun, D. (2014). Siyaset Bilimi. 7. Baski. Beta Basim Y. Istanbul.
  13. Dursun, D. (2007). Turkiye’nin Donusum Sureci, Dinamikleri ve Genel Ozellikleri. Donusum Surecindeki Turkiye: Aktorler Alanlar, Sorunlar, Ed. D. Dursun, B. Duran, H. Al, Alfa Y. Istanbul.
  14. Emiroglu, K. (2015). Kisa Osmanli-Turkiye Tarihi: Padisahlik Kulturu ve Demokrasi Ulkusu, Iletisim Y. Istanbul.
  15. Erdogan, M. (2003). Turkiye’de Anayasalar ve Siyaset. Liberte Y. Ankara.
  16. Goclu, A. (2015). Turkiye'de Demokrasi Kulturu ve Medya. Literaturk academia. Istanbul.
  17. Heper, M. (1997). Islam and Democracy in Turkey: Toward a Reconciliation?. Middle East Journal, 50 (1). 32-45.
  18. Heper, M. (1980). Center and Periphery in the Ottoman Empire: With Special Reference to the Nineteenth Century. SAGE Journal. 1 (1). 81-105.
  19. Irawan, B. (2016). Perkembangan Demokrasi Di Negara Indonesia (Endonezya Ulkesinde Demokrasi Gelisimi). Journal of Democracy. Vol. 55 (1).
  20. Kalaycioglu, E., ve SARIBAY, A.Y. (2009). Tanzimat: Modernlesme Arayisi ve Politik Degisme. Turkiye’de Politik Degisim ve Modernlesme, Ed. E. Kalaycioglu, A.Yasar Saribay, Dora Yayincilik, Istanbul.
  21. Keyman, E. F (2002). Globallesme Soylemleri, Ozgurluk Sorunsali ve Turkiye. Liberalizm Devlet ve Hegemonya, Der. F. Keyman, Everest Y. Istanbul.
  22. Keyman, E.F. (1999). Turkiye ve Radikal Demokrasi, 1.Bsm, Baglam Y. Ankara.
  23. Koker, L. (2008). Demokrasi, Elestiri ve Turkiye, Dipnot Y. Ankara.
  24. Kurniawan, D. (2016). Demokrasi Indonesia dalam Lintasan Sejarah Yang Nyata dan Yang Seharusnya (Gercek Bir Tarihsel Yorungede Endonezya Demokrasisi ve Ne Olmasi Gerektigi). Journal Mozaik: Kajian Ilmu Sejarah. Vol. 8 (1).
  25. Moleong, L. J. (2018). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif (Qualitative Research Methodology). Bandung. PT. Rosdakarya youth.
  26. Nebati, N. (2014). Milli Gorus’ten Muhafazakar Demokrasiye, Alfa Y. Istanbul.
  27. Prasisko, G. (2019). Demokrasi Indonesia Dalam Masyarakat Multikultural (Cok Kulturlu Bir Toplumda Endonezya Demokrasisi). Journal Universitas Mercu Buana Indonesia. Vol.4 (1)
  28. Purnamawati, E. (2020). Perjalanan Demokrasi di Indonesia (Endonezya'da Demokrasi Yolculugu). Journal of Palembang University. Vol. 18 (2).
  29. Sakyi, D., and Adams, S., (2012). Democracy, Government Spending, and Economic Growth: The Case of Ghana 1960–2008. The Journal of Applied Economic Research, 6(3), 361-383.
  30. Suimi, F. (2018). Fungsi Partai Politik dalam Meningkatkan Partisipasi Politik Ditinjau dari Hukum Positif (Pozitif Hukuk Acisindan Siyasi Katilimi Arttirmada Siyasi Partilerin Islevi). Al Imarah: Jurnal Pemerintahan dan Politik Islam. Vol. 3, No. 2.
  31. Tavares, J., and Wacziarg, R. (2001). How democracy affects growth. European Economic Review, 45(8), 1341-1378.
  32. Yavuz, M. H. (2008). Modernlesen Muslumanlar: Nurcular, Naksiler, Milli Gorus ve Ak Parti, 2. Bsk, Kitap Y. Istanbul.

Most read articles by the same author(s)