Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 285 Download : 278

Main Article Content

Abstract

Political parties reflect a democratic state, which is believed to be a condition for modern state life. As institutions for channeling interests, political parties are used as communication with a two-way function, namely, top-down and bottom-up. If this can be carried out well, then political parties' function as political socialization, political participation, political communication, articulation of interests, aggregation of interests, and policymaking can run well to realize the expected political development. The research method used in this research is qualitative research methods. Through qualitative research, the author has created a complex picture, examined words, reviewed detailed reports from the point of view of resource persons, and conducted studies on natural situations. This study aims to determine direction of political parties' development in the Russian Republic of Tatarstan, political parties' function, and political development amid a society in this modern era. The problem in this research is that political parties in Russia tend to have their own interests, either from the central government or the state or Federation governments. In addition, there tends to be a mismatch between the central and state governments in decision making. In fact, in the context political parties can be a tool for realizing development in a country. Even though there are problems, the results showed that political parties in the Republic of Tatarstan rated quite well in carrying out their functions by the functions of political parties according to the Law of the Russian Federation and the Law of the Republic of Tatarstan concerning Political Parties. The development of political parties in the Tatarstan Republic has played a role in controlling conflicts of interest among the Republic of Tatarstan.

Keywords

Political Parties Direction of Development Political Development Republic of Tatarstan Russia

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Author Biographies

Stanislav Vladimirov Mladenov, Kazan Federal University, Russia

Department of International Relations

Munadhil Abdul Muqsith, University (RUDN University), Russia

Department of Communication, Peoples' Friendship

Refly Setiawan, Kazan Federal University, Russia

Department of Political Science,

References

  1. Belyaev, V.A. (2007). Worldview and social behavior of the ruling elite of Tatarstan. Social Sciences and modernity: Kazan.
  2. Djokic, A. (2020). The perspectives of Russia's soft power in the western Balkans region. Rude journal of political science, 22(2), 231–244. Https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-1438-2020-22-2-231-244
  3. Dolzhikova, A. V., & moseykina, m. N. (2020). Institutions and educational and cultural tools of migration policy in modern Russia. Rude journal of political science, 22(3), 387–400. Https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-1438-2020-22-3-387-400
  4. Erman., & Albintani, M. (2018). Politik Identitas dan Negara Bangsa di Riau. Nakhoda: Jurnal Ilmu
  5. Pemerintahan, Vol. 17 (29), 1–13.
  6. Farida, I., & Setiawan, R. (2018). Leadership in cope with prostitute in social department of Bandar Lampung. Samurai international journal of social sciences and development, 2(1), 1. Https://doi.org/10.24967/saburaiijssd.v2i1.325
  7. Gabdrakhmanova, G.F. (2008). We are they (attitude towards migrants in the republic of Tatarstan). Sotsiol:
  8. kazan.Golosov, G.V. (2014). The territorial genealogies of Russia's political parties and the transferability of political machines. Post-soviet affairs. Vol. 30 (6). 464-480. Https://doi.org/10.1080/1060586x.2014.882106.
  9. Ilinskaya, S. G. (2018). The sea of Russian culture (Russian identity and the concept of tolerance). Rude journal of political science, 20(4), 496–505. Https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-1438-2018-20-4-496-505
  10. Izmailov, I.l. (2018). History is a factor in national mobilization. Kazan press: Kazan.
  11. Kuznetsov, I. I. (2020). Great patriotic war in school literature: features of political socialization of students. Rude journal of political science, 22(2), 245–261. Https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-1438-2020-22-2-245-
  12. Muqsith, M. A. (2019). Effect of fake news for democracy. Journal of chemical information and modeling, 53(9), 1689–1699. Https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15408/jch.v7i3.12956
  13. Oversloot, H., & Verheul, R. (2006). Managing democracy: political parties and the state in Russia. Journal of communist studies and transition politics. Vol. 22 (3). 383-405. Https://doi.org/10.1080/13523270600855795.
  14. Makarov, G.M. (2016). Nagasaki and the history of civilization. Moscow press: Moscow.
  15. Markov, r. (2016). Situation of the kryashens (book of the ethnological monitoring and early Warning network). Moscow media: Moscow.
  16. Ross, C. (2011). The rise and fall of political parties in Russia's regional assemblies. Europe- Asia studies. Vol. 63 (3). 429-448. Https://doi.org/10.1080/09668136.2011.557535.
  17. Sergey, S. (2020). The republic of Tatarstan: reduced to a common denominator?. Russian Politics & law. Vol 56 (36). 222-235. Doi:10.1080/10611940.2019.1784627
  18. Setiawan, R. (2017). Partisipasi publik dalam program bantuan listrik pedesaan Masyarakat kabupaten mesuji. Jurnal kebijakan & pelayanan publik (e-jkpp), Vol. 3 (3). 82-92.
  19. Setiawan, R. (2016). Peranan etika aparatur sipil negara dalam pelayanan publik pada Dinas kependudukan dan catatan sipil (disdukcapil) kota bandar lampung. Jurnal kebijakan & pelayanan publik (e-jkpp), Vol. 2 (2), 46-57
  20. Setiawan, R., & Melinda, E. (2020). Optimization of the Implementation of Village Government in Indonesia. RUDN Journal of Public Administration. Vol 7 (4).
  21. Setiawan, R., Abdurahman, A., Pertiwi, P. G., & Saputri, S. (2020). Reaksi perekonomian rusia ditengah pandemi covid-19. ‘adalah, Vol. 4 (1).
  22. Sintani, F. A., Tuanaya, W., & Wance M. (2020). Kaderisasi Dan Penetapan Calon Legislatif Pada Partai Politik (Studi DPD Partai Nasional Demokrat Seram Bagian Barat 2019). Nakhoda: Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan, Vol. 19 (1). 75-90.
  23. Valeev, R. (2005). Tatars at home. Kazan press: kazan.
  24. Zubarevich, N. (2017). The burden of the regions, what has changed in ten years?. Journal Russian Politics & law, 55 (2), 61-76. Doi.org/10.1080/10611940.2017.1393269

Most read articles by the same author(s)