Main Article Content

Abstract

Institutional empowerment will push the improvement of farmer productivity which can affect the well-being of farmer life. The purpose of this article is to determine the role of institutions in the development of the Center for Agricultural Development Information in rural and the efforts that can be made to create synergy between institutions and PIPP. This paper uses a literature review by looking for relevant references according to existing problems. The data has been obtained are then analyzed using descriptive analysis methods. The results and discussion show that some of the institutions involved in the Agricultural Development Information Center (PIPP) are, universities, local governments, opinion leaders, non-governmental organizations (NGOs), farmer organizations (extension agents, farmer contacts, farmer group associations, (Gapoktan) and farmer groups). Empowering farmers through common perceptions and alignment of goals, strengthening institutions for the continuity and sustainability of resources and structuring institutional capacity, improving institutional management, improving leadership patterns, and transparency.

Keywords

Agricultural communication development information Rural

Article Details

Author Biographies

muhammad Alif, Universitas Lambung Mangkurat

Study Program of Communication Sciences

Selly Oktarina, Faculty of Agriculture Universitas Sriwijaya

Study Program of Agribusiness

Anna Gustina Zainal, FISIP Universitas Lampung

Study Program of Communication Sciences

References

  1. Alif, M. (2017). Partisipasi petani dalam komunikasi penyuluhan,. Metacommunication: Journal of Communication Studies, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.20527/mc.v2i2.4416.
  2. Anderies, J. M., & Janssen, M. A. (2013). Robustness of social-ecological systems: Implications for public policy. Policy Studies Journal. https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12027
  3. Andriaty, E., Sankarto, B., & Setyorini, E. (2011). Kajian kebutuhan informasi teknologi pertanian di beberapa Kabupaten di Jawa. Perpus. Pertanian, 20(2).
  4. Arifin, B. (2005). Ekonomi Kelembagaan Pangan. LP3ES.
  5. Cooke, L. (2005). A visual convergence of print, television, and the internet: Charting 40 years of design change in news presentation. In New Media and Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444805049141
  6. Haitami, M., & Rengganis, A. (2021). The Dilemma of Good Governance Implementation in Indonesia during the Pandemic of Corona Virus Disease (COVID-19). Journal of Advance in Social Sciences and Policy, 1(1), 55–67. https://doi.org/10.23960/jassp.v1i1.25
  7. Leeuwis, C., & Sumarah, B. E. (2009). Komunikasi untuk inovasi pedesaan: berpikir kembali tentang penyuluhan pertanian. kanisius.
  8. Lorayna, K. J. A., & Caelian, M. V. (2020). Civil Society Organization Participation in Comprehensive Agrarian Reform Program Implementation. Philippine Social Science Journal Civil, 3(1), 127–141.
  9. Mardikanto, T. (2009). Sistem Penyuluhan Pertanian. Surakarta. Universitas Sebelah Maret Press.
  10. Melfianora. (2019). Penulisan Karya Tulis Ilmiah dengan Studi Literatur. Open Science Framework.
  11. Morissan. (2008). Manajemen Media Penyiaran: Strategi Mengelola Radio & Televisi. Manajemen Media Penyiaran: Strategi Mengelola Radio & Televisi.
  12. Mulyandari, R., Saleh, A., & Dadan. (2010). Revitalisasi Radio Pertanian Ciawi (RPC) sebagai Pusat Informasi Pembangunan Pertanian. Informatika Pertanian, 19(1).
  13. Muñoz-Pascual, L., & Galende, J. (2020). Ambidextrous knowledge and learning capability: The magic potion for employee creativity and sustainable innovation performance. Sustainability (Switzerland). https://doi.org/10.3390/SU12103966
  14. Nasrul, W. (2012). Pengembangan Kelembagaan Pertanian Untuk Peningkatan Kapasitas Petani Terhadap Pembangunan Pertanian. Menara Ilmu.
  15. Oktarina, S., & Rustiadi. (2008). Keefektivan Komunikasi dalam Pengembangan Peran-Peran Kelembagaan Agropolitan. Jurnal Komunikasi Pembangunan. https://doi.org/10.29244/jurnalkmp.6.2.%p
  16. Oktarina, Selly, & Sarwoprasodjo, S. (2018). Strategi Komunikasi Politik Opinion Leader Dalam Difusi Program Pembangunan Dan Pengembangan Lembaga Lokal Di Pedesaan (Opinion Leader Political Metacommunication: Journal of 3(1). https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.20527/mc.v3i1.4687
  17. Purwaka, T. H. (2008). Model Analisis Pengembangan Kapasitas. Penerbit Fakultas Hukum Unika Atma Jaya.
  18. Quingco Joyfe G, & S, L. C. (2019). The Economic Impact, Contribution, and Challenges of Micro Business Enterprises to the Local Development. Philippine Social Science Journal The, 2(2), 107–122.
  19. Rogers, E. M. (1995). Diffusion of inovation (Fifth Edit). Free Press.
  20. Sunanto, & Yuniarsih, E. (2011). Gapoktan Menyambut Program Subsidi Pupuk Langsung ke Petani. Buletin Inovasi Dan Informasi Pertanian BPPT Sulsel. http://sulsel.litbang.deptan.go.id/ind/index.php?option=com_content&view=
  21. Tisenkopfs, T., Kunda, I., sumane, S., Brunori, G., Klerkx, L., & Moschitz, H. (2015). Learning and Innovation in Agriculture and Rural Development: The Use of the Concepts of Boundary Work and Boundary Objects. Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension. https://doi.org/10.1080/1389224X.2014.991115
  22. Touihri, M., Séguy, M., Imbeau, L., Mazerolle, M. J., & Bird, D. M. (2019). Effects of agricultural lands on habitat selection and breeding success of American kestrels in a boreal context. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2018.11.017
  23. Zainal, A. G., Singagerda, F. S., Sanusi, A., & Akbar, M. F. (2019). Community development communication model and improving the role of agropolitan institutions. International Journal of Scientific and Technology Research.
  24. Zainal, A. U., & Prakoso, G. H. (2019). The Influence of Emotional Intelligence and Motivation Toward Agricultural Extension’s Performance at Agricultural Office of Tanggamus District. Jurnal Penyuluhan, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.25015/penyuluhan.v15i1.17081