Main Article Content

Abstract

This paper aims to describe two problems of investment policy during the New Order regime which leaned towards neoliberal elements or the Washington Consensus; However, after the New Order regime, it was more inclined to a neo-developmental strategy, and saw development strategies related to investment policies change due to internal factors including the presidential election, executive-legislative relations and competing technocrats visvis nationalist economists and external factors such as the global commodity boom. of China’s high demand. The argument of this article is deliberately trying to provide new understanding and insight on investment policies under the administration of President Joko Widodo.

Keywords

Neoliberalism Neo-developmentalism Foreign Capital New Order Indonesia Contemporary

Article Details

Author Biography

Muhamad Iksan, National Cheng Kung University

Department of Political Science, Graduate Institute of Political Economy

References

  1. Athukolara, P. M & A Patunru (2019) Domestic value-added, export, and employment: an Input-Output Analysis of Indonesian Manufacturing, ERIA Discussion Paper Series No 292.
  2. Bresnan, J. (1993) Managing Indonesia; The Modern Political Economy, New York: Columbia University Press.
  3. Chang, H.-J. (2011) Hamlet without the Prince of Denmark: how development has disappeared from today’s development discourse in Khan, Sharukh R & J Christiansen (2011) Toward New Developmentalism: Market as means rather than master. London: Routledge.
  4. Chweiroth, J (2007) Neoliberal Economists and Capital Account Liberalization in Emerging Markets, International Organization 61, page 443-463.
  5. CIPE 2020. Mitigating Governance Risks from Investment in Southeast Asia, available online: https://www.cipe.org/resources/mitigating-governance-risks-from-investment-in-southeast-asia/
  6. Denzau, A. & D.North (1994) Shared Mental Models: Ideologies and Institutions, Kyklos vol 47, page 3-31
  7. Dinata, S. et al 2020 The Outcome of China’s Investment in Indonesia: Lessons from the Nickel Industry, available online: https://www.cipe.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/MXW_CIPE_ChinaReport_20200420_Indonesia.pdf
  8. Evans, P.E. (1985) Transnational Linkage and the Economic Role of the State: An Analysis of Developing and Industrialized Nations in the Post-World War II Period in P.B
  9. Evans, D Ruechemeyer & Theda Skocpol (eds)(1985) Bringing the State Back in, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  10. Evans, P. B. D. Ruechemeyer & T. Skocpol (eds)(1985) Bringing the State Back in, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Evans, P.B. (1987) ForeignCapital and the Third World State in Myron Weiner and Samuel Huntington (eds) (1987) Understanding Political Development, Cambridge: Brown series in comparative politics.
  11. der Eng, P. van. (2014) Mining and Indonesia’s Economy: Institutions and Value Adding, 1870-2010. 2014–5. Center for Economic Institutions, Institute of Economic Research, Hitotsubashi University.
  12. der Eng, P. van (2018) The expansion of Chinese FDI and Chinese firms in Indonesia, paper presented at LPEM FEB –University of Indonesia.
  13. Hay, C. (2007) The genealogy of neoliberalism in Ravi Roy, Arthur Denzau and Thomas Willett. Neoliberalism: National and Regional Experiments with Global Ideas, Routledge: USA.
  14. Garnaut, R (2015) Indonesia Resource Boom in International Perspective: Policy Dilemmas and Options for Continued Strong Growth, Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, 51 (2), page 189-212.
  15. Gerring, J. (2012) Mere Description. British Journal of Political Science 42 (4), page 721-746.
  16. Hill, H (1996) Indonesian’s industrial policy andperformance: “Orthodox” vindicated, Economic Development and Cultural Change 45 (October), page 147-174.
  17. Hill, H. and S. Negara (2019) The Indonesian Economy in Transition: Policy Challenges in the Jokowi Era and Beyond. ISEAS: Singapore.
  18. Inalum 2019 completion of PT Freeport Indonesia Divestment Process, available online: https://inalum.id/en/read/Completion-of-PT-Freeport%20Indonesia-%28PTFI%29-Divestment-Process-and-Issuance-of-IUPK-as-Substitute-of-PTFI%27s-Contract-of-Work
  19. Jepson, N. (2020) In China's Wake: the Commodity Boom Transformed Development Strategies in the Global South.New York: Columbia University Press, available online: http://cup.columbia.edu/book/in-chinas-wake/9780231187978
  20. Khan, S. R & J. Christiansen (2011) Toward New Developmentalism: Market as means rather than master. London: Routledge.
  21. Khan, S.R. (2011) Exploring and naming an economic development alternative in Khan, Sharukh R & J Christiansen (2011) Toward New Developmentalism: Market as means rather than master. London: Routledge.
  22. Kuncoro, M, T. Widodo & R. McLeod (2009) Survey of recent development. Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies 45(2), page 151-176. https://doi.org/10.1080/00074910903040302
  23. Levi, M & B.Weingast (2019) Douglas North’s Theory of Politics, Political Science and Politics April 2019, DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096518002111
  24. Lindbland, J.T. (2015) Foreign DirectInvestment in Indonesia: Fifty Years of Discourse, Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, 51 (2), page 217-237, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00074918.2015.1061913
  25. Marks, S.V. (2007) Mental models of the economy and economic policy in Indonesia in Ravi Roy, Arthur Denzau and Thomas Willett. Neoliberalism: National and Regional Experiments with Global Ideas, Routledge: USA.
  26. Pangestu, M, S Rahardja and L.Y. Ing (2015) Fifty Years of Trade Policy in Indonesia; New World Trade, Old Treatments, Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, 51 (2), page 239-261.
  27. Prasetyawan, W (2017) Indonesia’s Mining Industry, 1997-2014: An Institutional Assessment in Teik, Khoo Boo et al (eds) (2017) Southeast Asia beyond Crisis and Traps Studies in Economic Transition, available online version: https://www.palgrave.com/gp/book/9783319550374
  28. Peereenboom, R (2014) China and the middle-income trap: toward a Post Washington. Post Beijing Consensus. Pacific Review 27 (5), page 651-673.
  29. Rock, M (1999) Reassessing the Effectiveness of Industrial Policy in Indonesia; Can the Neoliberals be Wrong? World Development 27(4), page 691-704, online version https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/wdevel/v27y1999i4p691-704.html
  30. Rodrik, D. (1996) Understanding economic policy reform. Journal of Economic Literature 34(1), page 9-41.
  31. Roy, R.K, A.T Denzau & T.Willett (2007) Neoliberalism: National and Regional Experiments with Global Ideas, New York: Routledge.
  32. Seawright, J & J. Gerring (2008) Case Selection Techniques in Case Study Research A Menu of Qualitative and Quantitative Options. Political Research Quarterly 61(2), page 294-308.
  33. Shiraishi, T (2014) Indonesian Technocracy in Transition: A Preliminary Analysis. Southeast Asian Studies 3(2), page 255-281.
  34. Slater, D. (2018) Party Cartelization, Indonesia-style presidential power-sharing and the contingency of democratic opposition. Journal of East Asian Studies 18(1), page 23-46. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/jea.2017.26
  35. Teik, K. B. et al (eds) (2017) Southeast Asia beyond Crisis and Traps Studies in Economic Transition, available online version: https://www.palgrave.com/gp/book/9783319550374
  36. Temple. J (2001) Growing into Trouble: Indonesia after 1966. DiscussionPaper 01/552.
  37. Todaro, M.P. and S.C Smith (2015) Economic Development 12thedition: Pearson: United Kingdom
  38. Wade, R (2011) The market as means rather than the master: the crisis of development and the future role-of-the state in Khan, Sharukh R & J Christiansen (2011) Toward New Developmentalism: Market as means rather than master. London: Routledge
  39. Wadhwa, K., and S.Reddy (2011) Foreign Direct Investment into Developing Asian Countries: The Role of Market Seeking, Resource Seeking and Efficiency Seeking Factors. International Journal of Business and Management 6(11), page 219-226.
  40. Warburton, E. (2019) A New Developmentalism in Indonesia? In Hal Hill and Siwage Negara (2019) The Indonesia Economy in Transition: Policy Challenge in the Jokowi Era and Beyond. ISEAS: Singapore.
  41. Weiner, M & S.P. Huntington (eds) (1987) Understanding Political Development, Cambridge: Brown series in comparative politics.
  42. White, J.D. & G.B. Adams (eds) (1994) Research in Public Administration. California: Sage.
  43. World Bank (1993). The East Asian Miracle: A World Bank Policy Research Report. New York: Oxford University Press.
  44. World Bank (2005) A Better Investment Climate for Everyone. Online version: http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/554071468182337250/pdf/288290WDR00PUB0r0investment0climate.pdf
  45. World Development Indicator (2019) online version available: https://databank.worldbank.org/source/world-development-indicators